新托福综合写作会给你两篇相关的材料，一片阅读，一篇听力。然后根据材料写作文。下面是小编整理的托福综合写作作文，大家可以参考参考。
新托福综合写作范文：打分偏高(inflation of marks)
老师给学生打的分数越来越高
1.分数打得低会减低学生的学习意志
2.会影响教师自己的测评结果
3.因为别的老师给的成绩高，如果不跟着给高分，学生出去找工作会吃亏
lecture
解决方案
1.应从小灌输正确的学习观念，不应因一次小失利而丧失信心
2.教师的评测可以改在学期结束前进行，这样学生的成绩就不会影响到评测结果
3.企业在选拔人才时可以看学生在班级中的排名而不是单纯的成绩
例文：The speaker challenges the reasoning that supports the current inflation in college grading system, and provides very specific alternatives to teacher evaluation timing and employer methodology in judging a student.
The speaker first argues that the inflated grades will not enable students to truly know their weakness, not to mention improve upon them. According to the reading, low grades will discourage students. The speaker rebuts this point and argues that the true meaning of education is not just to satisfy students. Letting the students make progress is the purpose and inflated grades will not help students in this way.
As for the reading's concerns that low grades will adversely affect teachers' evaluation, the speaker offers a solution. By finishing the teachers' evaluation before the end of the semester, we can sever the connections between the students' grades and teachers' evaluations.
Lastly, the speaker argues that the school does not have to follow the trend of inflated grades invariably. The reading argues that if the school does not follow the trend, their students will be discriminated, the lecture says that this problem can be solved by providing a weighted relative score. This score will pinpoint a student's percentile in the whole student body and show the other students' scores, thus allowing employers to clearly position the student among the entire student body.
新托福综合写作范文：网络问卷(web based survey)
网络问卷相对传统问卷的优势
1.调查范围更广，所以调查结果就更为准确(逻辑错误：参加人多并不代表范围广，也不能保证效果好)
2.发放，填写和收集问卷更加方便简单
3.成本低
lecture
反驳网络问卷的优势
1.所取得的调查结果不全面(biased)，因为不是所有人都会上网，中老年人上网会比较少，而年轻人上网比较多
2.成本并不会低，因为一个好的网络问卷需要一个团队的大量工作(提出新的证据：网络问卷也需要成本和人力资源)
3.大多数人对网络问卷都不严肃，会得到不正确的信息，容易混淆视听。
例文： The speaker questions the effectiveness of web based surveys by providing evidences contradictory to the reading.
First, he identified the reading's logical flaw in assuming that an increase in the scope and quantity of the survey will automatically translate to greater precision of the surveys. However, if surveys aim to question people over 60 years old, how can these old people conduct surveys online since this group seldom surf the Internet? The web surveys are effective in reaching mainly the young generation. Thus the results cannot be extended to demonstrate the views of the whole population.
Second, although the web-based surveys will lower paper cost, they will inevitably incur new costs in web designing, flashy features, and other elements, which will require more costly team work. This evidence effectively attacks the reading's argument that web surveys will certainly reduce the cost of the survey.
In the end, many web designers tend to overdo in the webpage and add fancy and flashy features. As a result, many people perceive the web-based surveys as not serious and are thus not willing to respond to the surveys. Unlike physical surveys that draw attention effectively, many web based surveys are simply ignored or even deleted.
