2016年12月10日雅思写作真题是关于淡水资源的使用的，下面是小编整理的雅思作文范文，欢迎阅读!
2016年12月10日雅思写作考试真题
Some people think they have the right to use as much fresh water as they want, while others believe governments should tightly control the use of fresh water as it is a limited resource. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
雅思作文范文【1】
Fresh water is a necessity in human’s daily life but how to use it varies in different societies. Some people take unlimited water consumption for granted, but others think that it is governments’ obligation to control fresh water as it is limited.
It is true that most residents in developed countries and coastal nations do not need to worry about the shortage of fresh water. Sophisticated infrastructures and sufficient precipitation can guarantee sufficient water supply. The price that these occupants need to pay is water bills and they can use as much water as they want if only they can afford it. Thus, it is undoubted that some of them hold the opinion that they can utilize the resource freely if they want.
While many other people do not need to concern about water consumption, it is also a fact that a large number of inhabitants in many developing countries have no access to clean water because of its scarcity. In those countries, natural environment and climate like droughts have a negative effect on water supply. What is worse, the poor situation makes water even more precious. If people use as much water as they want in those areas, it can almost be sure that water supply will fail to meet some people’s daily need. Therefore, it is reasonable that local officials limit the individual water use and people who waste it will be punished.
In my opinion, fresh water should not be used without any restriction. Water supply depends on heavily on natural environment that it can be regarded as limited resource in some countries. Water conservation, whether it is advocated by government or not, is what people should insist on.
主旨句：
In my opinion, fresh water should not be used without any restriction.
雅思作文范文【2】
When it comes to the issue about the use of fresh water, some people argue that they are entitled to consume fresh water without limitation, but others believe that the use of fresh water should be controlled by governments strictly.
On one hand, individuals have the right to use fresh water as long as they pay for it. Fresh water is also a kind of commodity. When a person paid money for fresh water, theoretically, this person possesses the property right of fresh water paid and such a property right is guaranteed by laws in most countries. Therefore, if citizens are able to afford the price of fresh water, their right of using water should be protected.
On the other hand, since fresh water is an infinite resource, excessive use of fresh water needs to be prohibited by the authorities. It is acknowledged that fresh water accounts for less than 1% of total water resources on the earth and many regions lack fresh water currently. If governments do not punish people who waste such a precious resource, in the future, fresh water may be exhausted and human beings may not find the alternative so quickly. Thus, in order to maintain the environmental sustainability, city councils need to regulate citizens’ behavior.
From my own perspective, it is unrealistic and immoral for individuals to use water excessively, but residents may also suffer if governments strictly limit the use of fresh water. A compromise may be that governments do not utilize political power, but economic measures to raise the public’s environmental awareness. To be more specific, if individuals or enterprises consume too much water, the price of fresh water will be much higher for them, which aims to remind them of the necessity of recycling water. For ordinary citizens, if they just use water within a normal range, there is no need to impose extra fines on them.
主旨句：
From my own perspective, it is unrealistic and immoral for individuals to use water excessively, but residents may also suffer if governments strictly limit the use of fresh water.
雅思作文范文【3】
Fresh water is considered as one of the most valuable resources in this planet, but its consumption is huge due to the growing population and the increasing demand in agriculture and industry. As water shortage is becoming increasingly severe in many parts of the world, it is suggested that the government should control the amount of water use.
Considering the deteriorating water crisis,it is urgent to reduce water consumption and conserve fresh water resource. For some reasons, wasting water is common in farms, factories and households. Some people believe the government has the obligation to intervene and take steps to combat the situation. For instance, if the authorities could raise the water price, or set the maximum quantity of water consumption in factors, or forcibly promote water-saving technology in agriculture sector, the water use is expected to decline.
However, some people object to the government's intervention and believe citizens have the right to use water as they want. The main concern is that the limitation of water use may lower the living standard and cause inconveniences in daily lives,In some cases, it could lead to poor sanitary condition and the spread of diseases.The downsides of the government's policy should also be noted. For example,raising water price seems to be an effective solution, but rich people may not care about it.Instead,it would only hurt the interests of the general public.
My View is that it is justified for the government to take necessary measures to tackle the water crisis, Perhaps the first step is to raise people's awareness of water conservation, making them realize the urgency of this task .With the support from the general public, the government's policies would be better implemented.
主旨句：
My View is that it is justified for the government to take necessary measures to tackle the water crisis, Perhaps the first step is to raise people's awareness of water conservation, making them realize the urgency of this task .With the support from the general public, the government's policies would be better implemented.
